Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness

Authors

  • Xiaofeng Zheng Architecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1461-1393
  • Edward Cooper Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham, Ningbo
  • Yingqing Zu Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Fudan University 220 Handan Road, Shanghai
  • Mark Gillott Architecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham
  • David Tetlow Architecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham
  • Saffa Riffat Architecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham
  • Christopher Wood Architecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.66

Keywords:

Building airtightness, Blower door, Pulse technique, Experimental validation

Abstract

A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently.

Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (<1%) with that reported in a study based on a large database obtained across a number of countries. It was also proven feasible to measure the airtightness of large buildings using the pulse technique.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-26

Issue

Section

Technical Articles